Tape storage: lean and green – and still thriving
Accounced by: Tandberg Data. 28/08/2009 05:16 (11 months)
Beats: Technology Countries: ArrayBy Lim Cheng Chuan, Country Manager (
While the world’s huge volumes of data storage continue to expand, even in a global financial crisis, a less obvious trend is occurring in the use of preferred storage media.
Although the industry has been predicting the demise of tape for decades, tape continues to flourish as the preferred technology for medium to long term data storage. Disk is becoming the preferred medium to restore recently backed up files due to the speed of data accessibility, but the needs for long term business continuity, data protection and data archive are different.
Tape remains the solution for these due to six unrivalled attributes: portability, vast capacity in a small footprint, long lifespan, very low cost per gigabyte, high energy efficiency and scalability. Indeed, a new paradigm for tape storage is taking place.
Tape is robust and portable for easy offsite storage. Disaster recovery strategies recognise that keeping data backups on same site won’t protect information from site-wide disasters, so DR facilitators turn to tape storage for its robust, removable data with up to 1.6TB of data on a single LTO-4 data cartridge. Moreover, tape is compact, lightweight and robust for safe transport. WORM and hardware-based data encryption provide additional security and regulatory compliance.
Space and
cost-efficient for longer term storage, tape offers a vast capacity in a small
footprint. That capacity is essential as
data volumes are predicted to escalate – six times the 2006 volume by 2010. Much
is this explosion results from increasing
compliance with legislation e.g. Sarbanes Oxley, HIPPA or the European Data
Retention Act. Space constraints in the data centre also boost tape usage. Tape
is preferred as it can be housed easily in a secure offline vault and exist
offline without power or cooling requirements.
Compliance with legislation means generally that
all data must be retained longer
Tape storage has proven life expectancy in
normal conditions and has been shown reliable when tested to extremes. A 2007 report
by Carnegie Mellon University recommended that CDs should be copied to new
media every two years; hard disk drives every five years; DVD+RW every 5-10
years; removable disk every 10 years*; DAT media every 15 years; and LTO
Ultrium media every 30 years. [MS1]
Responding easily to the challenge of storing
longer term archive data without breaking the bank, tape provides an
exceptionally cost-effective $/GB ratio.
LTO-4 Ultrium costs only 5 cents per GB for its typical capacity of
1.6TB, while DAT 160 costs 24 cents per GB for their 160GB cartridges, SATA
hard disk drive 35 cents per GB for 500GB drives, DVD+RW 63 cents per GB for a 4.7GB
disk and removable disk drive $1.45 per GB for the 160GB cartridges.
Tape is also energy efficient, in fact it is
cool! Responding to the challenge of managing
data centre power and cooling limitations, tape storage can decrease storage
power requirements by 99 per cent. A 2007 study by The Clipper Group showed
that the cost of energy to run a tape library was only 45 cents per terabyte,
while energy costs for both SATA disk and VTL were $96 per TB. The energy
required to store data on different tape media differs too – the Clipper Group
reported that while LTO-4 required only .037 watts per gigabyte, LTO-3 needed
.075 watts per gigabyte, DAT 160 required .128 watts and DAT 72 burnt up .197
watts of power.
Future scalability is another area where tape defies
industry predictions by continuing to innovate.
Consider the challenge of protecting an investment in technology by allowing
for data growth over time. Over the years, tape has a stellar record in this
area. Tape storage provides proven
reliability, a wide range of capacity and performance points, backward
compatibility for a seamless growth path, and tape libraries that offer even higher
levels of scalability. Finally LTO’s robust
roadmaps for LTO provide investment protection.
Protecting information is an absolute
necessity for any business, although not all enterprises make it a
priority. Developing the correct
strategy means understanding the data and its value, and understanding cost
saving tactics as well as the environmental impact and associated costs.
As tape technology continues to evolve to meet
the archiving demands of today’s data centres, it is imperative that any
storage strategy that is economical, environmentally responsible and designed
for true data protection must include a tape solution.
Cost savings can be achieved with a realistic mix of disk and tape. Customer storage objectives are typically: performance/compliance/disaster protection/reduced TCO and energy costs. Blended tape and disk can address these objectives.
|
|
SATA Disk |
Tape |
Blended D & T |
D:T Ratio |
D:B Ratio |
|
Hardware |
$5,067,652 |
$263,771 |
$1,376,693 |
19 |
4 |
|
Product & DR cartridges |
nil |
$168,750 |
$126,250 |
nil |
nil |
|
Maintenance |
nil |
$240,036 |
$208,699 |
nil |
nil |
|
Power & Cooling |
$805,098 |
$40,396 |
$211,612 |
20 : 1 |
4 : 1 |
|
Floor Space |
$493,200 |
$227,452 |
$332,092 |
2 : 1 |
1 : 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cost |
$6,365,950 |
$946,405 |
$2,255,346 |
7 : 1 |
3 : 1 |
It is clear that the market has accepted
a blended tape/disk strategy that ensues storage optimisation. Fleishman–Hillard
research for the LTO Program shows that over 70 per cent of companies use disk and tape, while 52 per cent of
them plan to increase tape usage. Up to
68 per cent of companies using disk-only storage plan to use tape. An IDC and IBM Marketing report shows that 70
per cent of the companies using disk and tape do so for interim storage, while
52 per cent plan to increase tape usage. Some 58 per cent use the media blend
for long term archiving, while 51 per cent plan to increase tape usage.
The same report shows that companies using disk-only storage decreased
13 per cent last year: 58 plan to start using tape for interim storage, while 68
per cent intend to start using tape for long-term archiving.
|
|
Power Require-ments per unit |
Cooling Require-ments per unit |
Total yearly Costs |
|
|
Power Require-ments per unit |
Cooling Requirements per unit |
Total yearly Costs |
|
1 Tape Library |
1.6 kWh |
1.6 kWh |
$4,065 |
|
15 Disk Controllers |
.33 kWh |
.39 kWh |
$13,718 |
|
4 LTO-3 Drives |
.017 kWh |
.017 kWh |
$173 |
|
105 Expansion Frames |
.33 kWh |
.39 kWh |
$96,027 |
|
Total Yearly Costs |
|
|
$4,238 |
|
more
Back Tandberg Data
ContactsAbout Tandberg DataPhone (Office) : 61-2-4341 5021 Website (Website) : http://www.tandbergdata.com/ Data storage & security |

